AI Agent Memory Explained: Multi-Tier Architecture, Vector Stores & Long-Term State

2026-11-10来源 dev.to AIEnglish

AI Agent Memory Explained: Multi-Tier Architecture, Vector Stores & Long-Term State

AI agents are becoming increasingly capable of handling complex tasks, interacting with external tools, coordinating with other agents, and making decisions autonomously. However, there is one major limitation developers must solve before deploying intelligent agents in production: memory.

Imagine interacting with an AI assistant that remembers your programming language preferences, understands the context of your previous projects, recalls decisions made during earlier conversations, and continues working without asking you to explain everything again.

Without memory, an AI agent starts almost every interaction with limited context. It may forget previous instructions, repeat completed tasks, lose important information, or make decisions without considering historical events.

This is where AI Agent Memory Architecture becomes important.

Memory allows AI agents to retain information, retrieve relevant knowledge, maintain conversational context, and build persistent state across multiple interactions.

Modern AI memory systems combine several technologies:

  • Short-term conversational memory.
  • Long-term persistent memory.
  • Vector databases and semantic search.
  • Structured databases and key-value stores.
  • Knowledge graphs.
  • Memory retrieval and summarization.
  • Memory expiration and lifecycle management.

In this article, we will explore how AI agent memory works, how multi-tier memory architectures are designed, how vector stores support long-term knowledge retrieval, and how to build reliable memory systems for production AI applications.

If you are exploring AI agents, LLM application development, and modern system architecture, explore more technical guides at DevsCampus.

1. What Is AI Agent Memory?

AI agent memory is the mechanism that allows an AI system to store, retrieve, update, and use information from previous interactions or experiences.

A traditional Large Language Model (LLM) processes a request using the context provided in its current input. Although some models support large context windows, this does not automatically mean they have persistent memory.

For example, consider this conversation:

User:
I am building a data engineering platform using Scala, Apache Spark, and Kafka.

AI Agent:
Understood. I can help you with Spark jobs, Kafka streaming, and Scala development.

Later:

User:
How should I optimize my streaming application?

An AI agent with memory can retrieve the previous information and provide recommendations based on the user's technology stack.

An agent without memory might provide generic recommendations without knowing which technologies the user is using.

AI Agent Memory vs. LLM Context Window

These concepts are related but different.

Feature LLM Context Window AI Agent Memory
Purpose Holds information for current processing Retains useful information over time
Lifetime Usually limited to a request or conversation context Can persist across sessions
Storage Model input context Database, files, vector stores, or application state
Retrieval Directly included in model input Retrieved based on relevance or identifiers
Scalability Limited by model context capacity Can scale independently
Data management Context construction Storage, retrieval, updates, and expiration

The context window determines how much information a model can process at once.

Memory determines what information an agent can retain and retrieve when needed.

A production AI system often uses both.

2. Why Do AI Agents Need Memory?

Without memory, AI agents face several practical problems.

2.1 Loss of Conversational Context

Consider an AI coding assistant.

During one session, a developer explains the application's architecture, programming language, database, and deployment environment.

After restarting the session, the agent may lose access to this information.

The developer must explain the same details again.

Persistent memory solves this problem by storing relevant information outside the LLM context window.

2.2 Repeating Previous Tasks

An AI agent may repeatedly suggest solutions that have already been implemented.

For example:

  • A developer already migrated a service to Java 21.
  • The agent recommends migrating from Java 17.
  • The developer explains that the migration is complete.
  • The agent forgets this information in a later session.

With persistent memory, the agent can retrieve previous decisions and avoid repeating outdated recommendations.

2.3 Personalized Responses

Memory allows agents to adapt their responses based on historical information.

Examples include:

  • Remembering a user's preferred programming language.
  • Understanding previous project requirements.
  • Retaining preferred response formats.
  • Remembering previously selected tools.
  • Tracking progress on long-running tasks.

2.4 Long-Running Autonomous Tasks

Some AI agents perform tasks that take hours, days, or even weeks.

Examples:

  • Research agents.
  • Software development agents.
  • Business automation agents.
  • Monitoring agents.
  • Multi-agent workflow systems.

These systems need persistent state to understand what has already happened and what should happen next.

For a deeper understanding of how multiple AI agents coordinate their tasks, read AI Agent Orchestration Explained: Multi-Agent Systems, Topologies & System Design on DevsCampus.

3. Types of AI Agent Memory

AI agent memory is commonly divided into different categories based on how information is stored and used.

The most important categories are:

  1. Working memory.
  2. Short-term memory.
  3. Episodic memory.
  4. Semantic memory.
  5. Procedural memory.
  6. Long-term memory.

Let's understand each one.

3.1 Working Memory

Working memory contains the information an agent needs to complete its current task.

It is similar to the temporary working area of a computer program.

For example, suppose an agent is debugging a Spark application.

Its working memory might contain:

{ "task": "Debug Spark streaming application", "language": "Scala", "framework": "Apache Spark", "streaming_source": "Kafka", "current_issue": "Consumer lag increasing", "current_step": "Analyze partition distribution" } 

This information helps the agent make decisions during the current execution.

Working memory is usually temporary and may be discarded after the task completes.

3.2 Short-Term Memory

Short-term memory stores recent conversational information.

For example:

User: I am using PostgreSQL. Agent: Which version? User: PostgreSQL 16. Agent: What is the issue? User: Queries are becoming slow. 

The agent retains this information so it can understand follow-up questions.

Short-term memory is generally maintained through:

  • Recent conversation history.
  • Message buffers.
  • Context summaries.
  • Session storage.
  • Redis or other temporary storage systems.

Short-term memory is useful when an agent needs to maintain continuity during an active conversation.

3.3 Episodic Memory

Episodic memory stores information about previous experiences and events.

Instead of simply remembering facts, it remembers what happened.

For example:

{ "event_id": "event-102", "event": "Spark job deployment failed", "environment": "preprod", "cause": "Insufficient executor memory", "resolution": "Increased executor memory", "timestamp": "2026-11-10T09:30:00Z" } 

Later, when the agent encounters a similar deployment failure, it can retrieve this previous experience.

Episodic memory is particularly useful for:

  • Debugging agents.
  • Autonomous software engineering agents.
  • Incident management agents.
  • Research assistants.
  • Workflow automation systems.

3.4 Semantic Memory

Semantic memory stores general facts, concepts, and knowledge.

Unlike episodic memory, it does not necessarily represent a specific event.

Example:

{ "technology": "Apache Kafka", "concept": "Consumer Group", "description": "A group of consumers that coordinate to consume partitions from Kafka topics." } 

Semantic memory helps agents understand relationships between concepts and retrieve useful knowledge.

It can contain:

  • Technical documentation.
  • Business rules.
  • User preferences.
  • Project information.
  • Domain-specific knowledge.

Vector databases are frequently used to support semantic memory retrieval.

3.5 Procedural Memory

Procedural memory stores information about how to perform tasks.

For example, a software engineering agent might remember:

Procedure: Deploy a Spark application 1. Validate the Spark configuration. 2. Check executor resources. 3. Validate the Docker image. 4. Submit the SparkApplication resource. 5. Monitor the application status. 6. Inspect driver and executor logs. 

Procedural memory is useful for agents that repeatedly perform structured workflows.

It can be implemented using workflow definitions, stored instructions, reusable tools, or structured procedures.

3.6 Long-Term Memory

Long-term memory stores information that should remain available beyond a single session.

Examples include:

  • User preferences.
  • Project architecture.
  • Previous decisions.
  • Frequently used procedures.
  • Historical incidents.
  • Important business rules.

Long-term memory may use multiple storage technologies depending on the information type.

Information Suitable Storage
Recent conversation Redis
User preferences PostgreSQL
Semantic knowledge Vector database
Historical events Document database
Entity relationships Graph database
Workflow state Relational database

The important point is that long-term memory is not necessarily one database.

It is a combination of storage and retrieval mechanisms.

4. Multi-Tier AI Agent Memory Architecture

A production AI agent should not store every piece of information in one memory system.

Different types of information have different access patterns, retention requirements, and retrieval needs.

This is why modern AI applications often use a multi-tier memory architecture.

A simplified architecture looks like this:

 USER REQUEST | v +------------------+ | AI AGENT | | LLM / Reasoning | +------------------+ | v +------------------+ | MEMORY MANAGER | +------------------+ | +------------+------------+ | | | v v v +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ | Working | | Short-Term| | Long-Term | | Memory | | Memory | | Memory | +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | v v v Current Task Redis Persistent DB State Session Vector Store Graph Store | v Memory Retrieval | v Relevant Context | v LLM Response 

Let's understand the different tiers.

Tier 1: Working Memory

Purpose: Maintain the state of the current task.

Typical technologies:

  • In-memory objects.
  • Application state.
  • Agent framework state.
  • Temporary execution context.

Example:

{ "task_id": "task-1001", "current_step": "analyze_logs", "status": "running", "attempt": 2 } 

Tier 2: Short-Term Memory

Purpose: Maintain recent conversation history.

Typical technologies:

  • Redis.
  • Session databases.
  • Conversation message stores.

Example Redis key:

agent:session:1001 

Stored value:

{ "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "Explain Kafka consumer lag." }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Consumer lag measures..." } ] } 

Redis provides low-latency access to frequently used session information.

Tier 3: Long-Term Memory

Purpose: Retain useful information across sessions.

Typical technologies:

  • PostgreSQL.
  • MongoDB.
  • Vector databases.
  • Knowledge graphs.
  • Object storage.

Example:

{ "user_id": "user-100", "memory_type": "preference", "content": "Prefers Scala examples for Spark applications.", "importance": 0.95 } 

The agent can retrieve this information during future conversations.

Tier 4: Knowledge and Experience Memory

Some architectures introduce another logical tier for larger knowledge collections and historical experiences.

It may contain:

  • Technical documentation.
  • Previous debugging experiences.
  • Business knowledge.
  • Completed workflow histories.
  • Relationships between entities.

This tier is especially useful for enterprise AI systems.

Important: These tiers are logical architectural boundaries, not mandatory separate databases. A system can implement several tiers using the same database technology.

Related Reading: Understanding AI Agent Architecture

Memory is only one component of a complete AI agent architecture. An autonomous agent also needs orchestration, tool execution, decision-making, and state management.

Explore these related DevsCampus guides:

These concepts are closely connected because an orchestrated AI system needs reliable memory to coordinate multiple agents and maintain state throughout complex workflows.

5. How Vector Databases Power AI Agent Memory

One of the most important technologies behind modern AI memory systems is the vector database.

Traditional databases retrieve information using exact conditions.

For example:

SELECT * FROM memories WHERE user_id = 'user-100'; 

However, AI agents frequently need to retrieve information based on meaning rather than exact words.

Consider these two sentences:

  1. "My Spark application is running slowly."
  2. "The distributed processing job has high execution latency."

Although the wording differs, both sentences describe similar concepts.

Traditional keyword searches may not identify their semantic similarity.

Vector search helps solve this problem.

5.1 What Are Embeddings?

An embedding is a numerical representation of text, images, or other data.

An embedding model converts text into a vector containing numerical values.

For example:

Input: "Apache Spark streaming optimization" 

The embedding model produces something like:

[0.21, -0.43, 0.87, 0.12, -0.56, ...] 

The actual vector may contain hundreds or thousands of dimensions, depending on the embedding model.

Texts with similar meanings tend to have nearby vector representations.

5.2 How Vector Search Works

The basic workflow is:

 USER CONVERSATION | v MEMORY EXTRACTION | v TEXT EMBEDDING | v VECTOR DATABASE | v SEMANTIC RETRIEVAL | v RELEVANT MEMORIES | v LLM CONTEXT 

Let's walk through an example.

Suppose an agent stores the following memory:

User is building a streaming data platform using Scala, Apache Spark and Kafka. 

The system generates an embedding and stores it in a vector database.

Later, the user asks:

How can I reduce processing delays in my application? 

The retrieval system converts this question into an embedding.

It searches for similar stored vectors and retrieves relevant memories.

The agent then understands that the user is probably referring to their Spark and Kafka streaming application.

This is called semantic retrieval.

5.3 Similarity Search

Vector databases commonly support similarity metrics such as:

Cosine Similarity

Measures the angle between two vectors.

[
CosineSimilarity(A,B) =
\frac{A \cdot B}{||A|| \times ||B||}
]

Euclidean Distance

Measures the straight-line distance between two vectors.

[
Distance(A,B) =
\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{n}(A_i-B_i)^2}
]

Dot Product

Measures the product of corresponding vector dimensions.

The appropriate metric depends on the embedding model and how its vectors are normalized.

5.4 Popular Vector Database Technologies

Some commonly used technologies include:

Pinecone

Managed vector database designed for similarity search and retrieval applications.

Weaviate

Open-source vector database supporting semantic search and hybrid retrieval.

Milvus

Distributed vector database designed for large-scale vector search.

Qdrant

Vector database providing similarity search, metadata filtering, and efficient retrieval.

Chroma

Developer-friendly vector database commonly used in prototypes and smaller AI applications.

pgvector

PostgreSQL extension that enables vector storage and similarity search inside PostgreSQL.

For applications already using PostgreSQL, pgvector can be a practical starting point because it avoids introducing a separate vector database immediately.

Further Learning: Vector Databases, Embeddings and Semantic Search

Vector databases are fundamental to semantic memory because they allow AI agents to retrieve information based on meaning rather than exact keyword matches.

Explore these related DevsCampus topics:

These guides connect vector storage concepts with real-world AI application architecture.

6. Implementing AI Agent Memory Using Python and Vector Stores

Let's understand a simplified implementation using Python, embeddings, and Chroma.

First, install the dependencies:

pip install chromadb sentence-transformers 

Create a vector database:

import chromadb from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer client = chromadb.PersistentClient( path="./agent_memory" ) collection = client.get_or_create_collection( name="long_term_memory" ) model = SentenceTransformer( "all-MiniLM-L6-v2" ) 

Step 1: Store a Memory

def store_memory(memory_id, text, user_id): embedding = model.encode(text).tolist() collection.add( ids=[memory_id], documents=[text], embeddings=[embedding], metadatas=[ { "user_id": user_id, "memory_type": "long_term" } ] ) 

Store a memory:

store_memory( "memory-001", "The user develops applications using Scala, Spark and Kafka.", "user-100" ) 

The system generates an embedding and stores the text alongside its metadata.

Step 2: Retrieve Relevant Memories

def retrieve_memory(query, user_id): query_embedding = model.encode(query).tolist() results = collection.query( query_embeddings=[query_embedding], n_results=5, where={ "user_id": user_id } ) return results["documents"] 

Example:

memories = retrieve_memory( "How can I optimize my streaming application?", "user-100" ) print(memories) 

The vector database searches for semantically similar memories belonging to the requested user.

Step 3: Add Retrieved Memory to the LLM Context

def build_agent_context(user_query, memories): memory_context = "\n".join( memory for group in memories for memory in group ) return f""" Relevant Previous Memories: {memory_context} Current User Request: {user_query} Use relevant memories to provide a contextual response. """ 

Now the application can pass the generated context to an LLM.

This is a simplified example. A production implementation also needs memory deduplication, update operations, access control, expiration policies, retrieval ranking, and error handling.

7. Memory Retrieval Strategies

Storing information is only one part of memory architecture.

The system must also decide which memories should be retrieved for a particular request.

Retrieving everything is expensive and can introduce irrelevant information into the LLM context.

Here are common retrieval strategies.

7.1 Semantic Retrieval

Retrieves memories based on vector similarity.

Example:

Query: How do I improve Kafka throughput? Retrieved memory: The user operates a Kafka-based streaming platform. 

This is useful when the wording of the current request differs from the stored information.

7.2 Metadata Filtering

Metadata filtering restricts searches based on attributes.

For example:

{ "user_id": "user-100", "memory_type": "technical_preference", "project": "streaming-platform" } 

The system can retrieve only memories belonging to a particular user, project, or category.

This is particularly important in multi-tenant applications.

7.3 Hybrid Search

Hybrid search combines:

  • Keyword-based retrieval.
  • Vector-based semantic retrieval.

Consider a query:

Why did Spark job PIPE-4821 fail? 

The exact identifier PIPE-4821 is important.

Vector search alone may not retrieve the exact record reliably.

Keyword search can find the identifier, while semantic search can retrieve related debugging information.

Combining both improves retrieval quality.

7.4 Recency-Based Retrieval

Some information becomes outdated.

For example:

Previous environment: Java 17 

Later:

Current environment: Java 21 

A memory system should consider timestamps and update previous information rather than blindly returning outdated facts.

7.5 Importance-Based Retrieval

Not all memories have equal value.

For example:

Memory Importance
Preferred programming language High
Current project architecture High
Temporary debugging observation Medium
One-time greeting Low

A retrieval system can assign importance scores and use them alongside semantic similarity.

A simplified ranking formula could be:

[
Score =
\alpha S +
\beta R +
\gamma I
]

Where:

  • S = Semantic similarity.
  • R = Recency score.
  • I = Importance score.
  • α, β, γ = Configurable weights.

The weights should be tuned against real retrieval evaluations rather than selected arbitrarily.

8. Memory Consolidation: Turning Conversations into Long-Term Knowledge

Storing every conversation message as a permanent memory is a bad architectural decision.

It creates several problems:

  • Duplicate information.
  • Unnecessary storage growth.
  • Irrelevant retrieval results.
  • Outdated facts.
  • Higher embedding and retrieval costs.

Instead, production AI systems often use a process called memory consolidation.

Memory consolidation converts temporary conversational information into useful persistent knowledge.

Consider this conversation:

User: I am developing a backend service using Scala. User: The service uses Apache Spark for processing. User: Kafka is used for event streaming. User: We deploy workloads on Kubernetes. 

Rather than storing four independent memories, the system can consolidate them:

{ "memory_type": "project_context", "content": "The user is developing a Scala backend platform using Apache Spark, Kafka and Kubernetes.", "importance": 0.95 } 

A typical consolidation workflow looks like this:

 CONVERSATION HISTORY | v MEMORY EXTRACTION | v INFORMATION FILTER | v DUPLICATE DETECTION | v MEMORY CONSOLIDATION | v IMPORTANCE SCORING | v PERSISTENT STORAGE 

Memory consolidation can run after each conversation, periodically, or when a particular event occurs.

The system should also preserve the source and timestamp of important memories so that conflicting information can be resolved.

9. Long-Term Memory and Database Architecture

A production AI application often needs multiple database technologies because different memory types have different storage requirements.

Consider this architecture:

 AI AGENT | v MEMORY SERVICE | +-------------+-------------+ | | | v v v Redis PostgreSQL Vector DB | | | v v v Session Structured Embeddings History Memories Semantic Data | | | +-------------+-------------+ | v MEMORY RETRIEVAL | v LLM CONTEXT 

Redis: Fast Session Memory

Redis is useful for:

  • Recent conversation history.
  • Active agent state.
  • Temporary task context.
  • Frequently accessed information.
  • Session expiration.

Example:

agent:session:user-100 

A TTL can automatically expire session information after a configured period.

PostgreSQL: Structured Memory

PostgreSQL can store:

  • User preferences.
  • Project metadata.
  • Memory categories.
  • Historical decisions.
  • Memory ownership.
  • Timestamps and expiration information.

Example table:

CREATE TABLE agent_memories ( id UUID PRIMARY KEY, user_id VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL, memory_type VARCHAR(50), content TEXT NOT NULL, importance FLOAT, created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ); 

Vector Database: Semantic Memory

A vector database stores embeddings and associated metadata.

It allows the agent to retrieve information based on semantic similarity.

Graph Database: Relationship Memory

Some AI applications need to understand relationships between entities.

For example:

User | | works_on v Data Platform | | uses +------> Apache Spark | +------> Apache Kafka | +------> Kubernetes 

Graph databases can represent these relationships explicitly.

They are particularly useful for knowledge-intensive applications where connections between entities matter.

10. Memory Management Challenges in Production AI Systems

Building a memory-enabled agent is relatively straightforward.

Building a reliable production memory system is much more challenging.

10.1 Memory Explosion

If an agent stores every conversation indefinitely, memory storage grows continuously.

This increases:

  • Storage costs.
  • Embedding generation costs.
  • Retrieval latency.
  • Duplicate information.
  • Context construction overhead.

Solution:

Implement memory lifecycle policies.

Memory Type Retention Strategy
Working memory Until task completion
Session memory Session TTL
Temporary events Configurable expiration
User preferences Until updated or deleted
Important project knowledge Long-term retention
Historical incidents Based on business requirements

10.2 Stale Memories

An agent may retrieve outdated information.

For example, a user previously worked with Java 17 but migrated to Java 21.

If the memory system returns the old information, the agent may generate incorrect recommendations.

Solution:

Use:

  • Timestamps.
  • Versioned memories.
  • Update operations.
  • Expiration policies.
  • Conflict resolution.

10.3 Incorrect Memory Extraction

An LLM may misunderstand a conversation and save an incorrect fact.

For example:

User: We are considering migrating to PostgreSQL. 

The system incorrectly stores:

User uses PostgreSQL in production. 

These statements have different meanings.

Solution:

Use structured memory extraction with explicit categories such as:

  • Confirmed fact.
  • Planned change.
  • Temporary observation.
  • User preference.
  • Unverified assumption.

Important memories should be validated before being treated as authoritative.

10.4 Multi-Tenant Data Isolation

Enterprise AI platforms may serve thousands of users and organizations.

One user's memory must never be exposed to another user.

For example:

{ "tenant_id": "tenant-001", "user_id": "user-100", "memory": "Internal project architecture" } 

Retrieval must enforce tenant and user authorization.

Do not depend only on the LLM to respect these boundaries.

The memory service and underlying database must enforce access control.

10.5 Privacy and Sensitive Information

Long-term memory introduces privacy risks.

An AI agent should not automatically retain every piece of information it encounters.

Production systems should implement:

  • Explicit memory consent where required.
  • Sensitive-data filtering.
  • Data minimization.
  • Encryption at rest and in transit.
  • Access control.
  • Memory deletion.
  • Audit logging.
  • Retention policies.

Memory deletion must cover all relevant representations, including database records, vector embeddings, caches, and derived summaries.

11. Advanced AI Agent Memory Patterns

Beyond basic storage and retrieval, modern AI systems use more advanced patterns.

11.1 Reflection-Based Memory

An agent can analyze its previous actions and identify useful lessons.

Example:

Task: Deploy a Spark application. Observation: Deployment failed because executor memory was insufficient. Reflection: The configured executor memory was lower than the workload required. Learned lesson: Validate executor memory against workload requirements before deployment. 

The agent stores the lesson and can apply it to future tasks.

11.2 Hierarchical Memory

Instead of storing every detail at the same level, hierarchical memory organizes information into summaries and detailed records.

Example:

Company Knowledge | v Engineering Projects | v Streaming Platform | v Kafka Configuration | v Detailed Configuration Records 

The agent can retrieve a high-level summary first and fetch detailed information when necessary.

This reduces unnecessary context consumption.

11.3 Shared Memory in Multi-Agent Systems

In multi-agent architectures, multiple agents may need access to shared knowledge.

For example:

 ORCHESTRATOR | +---------+---------+ | | | v v v Research Coding Testing Agent Agent Agent | | | +---------+---------+ | v SHARED MEMORY | +---------+---------+ | | | v v v Redis PostgreSQL Vector DB 

A research agent can store findings that a coding agent later retrieves.

Similarly, a testing agent can store test results that the orchestrator uses to decide the next action.

However, shared memory needs clear ownership, versioning, access control, and conflict-resolution rules.

11.4 Memory-Augmented RAG

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) retrieves relevant external knowledge and provides it to an LLM.

Memory-augmented RAG extends this concept by combining external knowledge with information from previous interactions.

For example:

Current User Query | v Retrieval Engine | +------------------+ | | v v User Memory Knowledge Base | | +------------------+ | v Context Assembly | v LLM | v Response 

This allows an agent to combine personal context, historical experiences, and external documentation.

Related Architecture: How AI Agents Coordinate and Share Knowledge

In advanced AI systems, memory becomes particularly important when multiple agents collaborate.

For example, a research agent may collect information, a coding agent may implement a solution, and a testing agent may validate the result.

All these agents need access to relevant shared information without losing their individual execution context.

Explore these DevsCampus guides:

Together, these articles explain how memory, orchestration, and tool execution work together to build autonomous AI applications.

12. AI Agent Memory vs. Traditional RAG

Although memory and RAG are related, they solve different problems.

Feature AI Agent Memory Traditional RAG
Primary purpose Retain information from interactions and experiences Retrieve...

原文:https://www.a8q9.cn/en/article/ai-agent-memory-explained-multi-tier-architecture-vector-stores-long-term-state-a38f09.html

相关文章